Results: 2004 Survey on Access Technology in Higher Education

Page 1 of 12

Administrative Issues: Staffing

Q1_1. Does your institution currently have a staff position whose sole responsibility is implementation of assistive technology?

(91 responses)

ResponseCount%
Yes4953.8
No4246.2

Q1_2. Where does your position reside within your institution's organizational structure?

(47 responses)

ResponseCount%
Disability Services3574.5
Information Technology (Computing Services)919.1
Library Services00.0
Other:
  • Disability Services AND Faculty Resource Center
  • Office of Equity
  • Office of Equity and Diversity
36.4

Q1_3. What is your salary range?

(47 responses)

ResponseCount%
$60,000 +714.9
$50,000 - $59,9991634.0
$40,000 - $49,9991123.4
$30,000 - $39,999612.8
$29,999 or less714.9

Q1_4. What is your highest degree attained?

(48 responses)

ResponseCount%
Bachelor's degree1429.2
Master's degree2450.0
Doctoral degree24.2
Other:
  • AA
  • AA
  • AS
  • BA + Master's begun
  • Post grad
714.6

Q1_5. How long, in years, have you provided technology accessibility services in a higher educational environment?

(55 responses)

ResponseCount%
2 years or less 8 14.5
3-5 years 11 20.0
6-10 years 17 30.9
More than 10 years 19 34.5

Q1_6. What percentage of your time is spent on each of the following duties?

End User Training

(49 responses)

Percentage of TimeCount%
Less than 25%4081.6
26 - 50%48.2
51 - 75%36.1
Greater than 75%24.1

Technical Support of AT Software and Hardware

(46 responses)

Percentage of TimeCount%
Less than 25%4189.1
26 - 50%48.7
51 - 75%12.2
Greater than 75%00.0

Awareness/Marketing/Advertising Regarding AT

(41 responses)

Percentage of TimeCount%
Less than 25%4097.6
26 - 50%12.4
51 - 75%00.0
Greater than 75%00.0

Web-Development

(33 responses)

Percentage of TimeCount%
Less than 25%3193.9
26 - 50%26.1
51 - 75%00.0
Greater than 75%00.0

Train-the-Trainer style Training

(28 responses)

Percentage of TimeCount%
Less than 25%2796.4
26 - 50%13.6
51 - 75%00.0
Greater than 75%00.0

Policy organization and coordination

(48 responses)

Percentage of TimeCount%
Less than 25%4797.9
26 - 50%12.1
51 - 75%00.0
Greater than 75%00.0

Policy adherence/tracking/validation

(35 responses)

Percentage of TimeCount%
Less than 25%35100.0
26 - 50%00.0
51 - 75%00.0
Greater than 75%00.0

Research/Investigation into new AT Software/Hardware

(55 responses)

Percentage of TimeCount%
Less than 25%5294.5
26 - 50%35.5
51 - 75%00.0
Greater than 75%00.0

Management of Technicians

(25 responses)

Percentage of TimeCount%
Less than 25%2496.0
26 - 50%14.0
51 - 75%00.0
Greater than 75%00.0

Teaching about AT

(43 responses)

Percentage of TimeCount%
Less than 25%4195.3
26 - 50%12.3
51 - 75%12.3
Greater than 75%00.0

Strategic planning for AT

(42 responses)

Percentage of TimeCount%
Less than 25%4197.6
26 - 50%00.0
51 - 75%00.0
Greater than 75%12.4

Developing campus partnerships

(51 responses)

Percentage of TimeCount%
Less than 25%4894.1
26 - 50%35.9
51 - 75%00.0
Greater than 75%00.0

Additional tasks that occupy respondents' time

Q1_7. Are there other staff whose job responsibilities include implementing assistive technology?

(65 responses)

ResponseCount%
Yes4670.8
No1929.2

Q1_8. What is the total number of your institution's full-time-equivalent staff allocated for the implementation of assistive technology?

(56 responses)

ResponseCount%
1 23 41.1
2 - 3 18 32.1
Between 1 and 2 6 10.7
Fewer than 1 7 12.5
More than 3 2 3.6

Q1_11. Which of the following statements best describes your approach toward recommending assistive technology to students? (check all that apply)

(65 responses)

ResponseCount%
Wait for students to initiate a request3756.9
Approach students with recommendations if I become aware of particular needs for assistive technology4163.1
Systematically meet with students to assess possible needs for assistive technology2843.1
Other:
  • Combination of waiting for request and making recommendations. But no real solicitation of students to use AT.
  • Comply with needs of students
  • Create stations across campus and encourage use by both current and prospective students by making them open to the community
  • Disability counselor refers students for AT introduction and evaluation if they feel it may be helpful to their students
  • Evaluation Course
  • Faculty involvement
  • New techniques are being discussed with the disability services provider based on survey results from students with disabilities over the past 3 years.
  • Proactively provide AT on campus in public omcputer labs
  • referal by counselor
  • referral from disability services
  • Referral from disability specialists
  • Referrals from learning specialist in Disability Dept.
  • requests via DSS
  • Semester file reviews
  • sometimes I simply have to force it on them
  • Two main areas - The university and those that come from the region to the Assessment Centre
  • Work with Academic Counselors
  • Work with coordinators to meet students' needs
1929.2