I. Indications
II. Contraindications
III. Risks
IV. Confirming fetal maturity
V. "Sweeping the membranes"
V. Cervical ripening--Indicated when inducation is indicated but cervix is unfavorable (e.g. if Bishop's Score < 8)
- May repeat dose x 1 6-12h after initial dose
- May stimulate contractions
- When contractions occur, us. start within 1h and peak in < 4h
- May cause hyperstimulation (> 5ctx/10min for total 20min)
- Occurs in 1% for intracervical gel and 5% for intravaginal gel
- If occurs, tx with IV or SQ terbutaline
- Irrigation of cx/vagina is not helpful
- Other side effects (uncommon)
- Fever
- Vomiting
- Diarrhea
- Contraindications
- Use with caution (esp. forms other than Cervidil) in pts with h/o prior c/s
- Don't use if having regular uterine contractions (risk of uterine hyperstimulation)
- Glaucoma (relative)
- Severe hepatic or renal impairment (relative)
- Asthma (relative)
- Guidelines for administration (ACOG)
- Have pt remain recumbent for 30min after administration
- Monitor FHR before and for 30min-2h after administration, longer if having contractions
- If using the sustained-release vaginal insert, monitor FHR until 15min after it is removed; remove at onset of labor
- Monitor maternal VS
- Don't start Oxytocin until 6-12h after administering gel OR 30-60min after removal of sustained-release vaginal insert (Cervidil)
- Different forms
- Intravaginal gel 2-5mg (locally compounded by hosp. pharmacy)
- Intracervical gel 0.5mg (locally compounded by hosp. pharmacy)--intracervical route may be more efficacious with very unripe cervices and cause less uterine stimulation than the vaginal route
- Prepidil (0.5mg dinoprostone intracervical gel in 2.5cc)--MAXIMUM 3 DOSES IN ANY 24h PERIOD
- Cervidil (10mg dinoprostone sustained-release vaginal insert) --slower release of medication than intravaginal gel; unlike the other products, can be removed should hyperstimulation occur, but higher incidence of hyperstimulation
- Comparisons among these
- IN a trial in 63 pts admitted for induction at > 36wks with Bishop score < 6 and cervical dilation 2cm or less, randomized to PGE2 placed intracervically or in posterior fornix, time to onset of labor and median time to delivery were not sig. diff. in the two groups, though among the pts who only required one dose, there was sig. lower time to delivery with intracervical administration (11.7h vs. 16.2h) (Obs. Gyn. 103:13, 2004--AFP)
VI. "Stripping" of membranes--may reduce need for induction BUT may be ass'd with risk of infection, bleeding from undx'd placenta previa, or accidental rupture of membranes.
VII. Amniotomy--When combined w/Oxytocin, reduces duration to delivery; can be ass'd with cord prolapse, chorioamnionitis, and rupture of vasa previa. ALWAYS FEEL FOR CORD before doing amniotomy and avoid dislodging the fetal head
IX. Induction with Misoprostol
- 130 women for induction randomized to receive induction by IV oxytocin or 100ug misoprostol intravag Q4h until labor was established. Misoprostol group at the outset had lower Bishop scores on average. However, median induction-to-delivery time sig. shorter (about 9.5 vs. 14.5h). Epidurals used more frequently in women receiving oxytocin (73% vs. 50%). No diff. in incidence of c/s. "Uterine tachysystole" sig. more common in misoprostol group (70% vs. 11%) (Obs. Gyn. 89:387, 1997)
- Misoprostol PO vs. Intravaginal--206 women at at least 37wks were randomized to Misoprostol 50mg PO vs. 50mg intravag; tx given Q4h until either (3 ctx Q10min or spontaneous ROM or concerning FHR pattern or other complications or delivery). Vaginal group had nonsig. higher rates of uterine tachysystole and hyperstimulation and sig. lower mean time to delivery (846min vs. 1072min). No diff. in use of epidurals or oxytocin or rates of c/s or assisted delivery, or neonatal outcomes (Obs. Gyn. 92:481, 1998--AFP)
- Misoprostol intravag vs. Oxytocin IV for induction for PROM at term
- 197 women with PROM at mean 38wks randomized to intravaginal misoprostol (25ug in posterior fornix); repeat after 6h if not in adequate contraction pattern) vs. IV oxytocin (up to 20mU/min) for labor induction. No sig. diff. in rates of vaginal delivery within 24h (76% w/misoprostol vs. 74% with oxytocin), total duration from induction to delivery, intra-amniotic infection, neonatal sepsis, and c/s (Am. J. Obs. Gyn 179:94, 1998--AFP)
- 108 women with PROM at > 37wks gestation not in active labor randomized to misoprostol 50ug PO Q4h vs. IV oxytocin; oxytocin group had sig. lower time to delivery (501 minutes vs. 720 minutes) (Obs. Gyn. 94:994, 1999--AFP)
- May be ass'd with higher risks of uterine rupture in VBAC than oxytocin inductionS
X. Influence of time of day in induction outcomes
- In a study in 620 women at 36-42wks gestation with cephalic presentation scheduled for prostaglandin induction randomized to admission at 8am vs. 8pm, there was no sig. diff. in primary outcomes of delivery within 24h, uterine hyperstimulation with adverse FHR changes, or c/s, but morning-admission women had sig. lower incidence of requiring oxytocin (45% vs. 54%) and among nullips, sig. lower incidence of operative vaginal birth (16% vs. 34%) (Obs. Gyn. 108:350, 2006--abst)
XI. For fetal demise--If remote from term, Oxytocin will be less effective; better if the cervix is ripened first.