![]() | Mickey's Memory Maximized by Man | ![]() |
By Ellen KuwanaNeuroscience for Kids Staff Writer September 22, 1999
September Is Time For SchoolSchool has started. You're being bombarded with new information. Concepts to understand. Spelling words to master. In no time at all, you'll be studying for quizzes and tests. Wish you could take a magic pill and learn things faster? Wish you could remember things for longer? Although this sounds like science fiction, it is already happening in laboratory mice. Warner Brother's television cartoon "Pinky and The Brain," in which The Brain is a genius mouse made by Acme Labs, may be closer to reality than you think. |
The Big Picture
By manipulating a single gene, scientists have created a genetically
engineered mouse that outperforms regular mice on learning and memory
tests. The results of this study were reported in the September 2, 1999
issue of the journal Nature. When they received an extra copy of
the NMDA receptor
gene, the mice were better able to navigate mazes, remember objects, and
retain for longer information that they had already
learned.
NMD-What?The NMDA receptor is an important molecule. It is the receptor for the neurotransmitter glutamate, an excitatory transmitter in the brain. The receptor is found in many neurons in the brain where it plays a crucial role in synaptic plasticity (the ability for synapses to change) and memory formation, which occurs when learning takes place. |
Genetic EngineeringTwo basic experiments can be performed to examine what function a gene is affecting. First, scientists can remove the gene or block its effect. This is called gene deletion or "knocking out" the gene.
|
Test One: Putting the Mice to the TestThe scientists compared the engineered mice (called transgenic mice) to control mice (regular lab mice). The mice were initially shown two different objects and a few days later they were shown one new object and one of the original objects. The regular mice spent equal time examining both objects, but the transgenic mice did something different: they only examined the new object, suggesting that they "knew" that they had already seen the other object. The researchers interpreted this to mean that they had remembered the old object, but the control mice did not.
Test Two: Not So Shocking Results Next, the
scientists put the
mice in a chamber and gave them small electrical shocks. The shocks were
not big enough to hurt the mice, but did appear to frighten them. After
getting a shock, the mice were returned to their cages. Sometime later
(ranging from one hour to one day), the mice were brought back to the
chamber. The transgenic mice showed more fear than the control mice,
suggesting that they remembered what had happened to them in that specific
place. The researchers then placed the mice in the chamber, shocked them,
and played a tone - this made the mice relate the sound to the shock. When
the mice heard the tone later, the transgenic mice displayed more fear
than the control group, again suggesting that they remembered the
association.
Test Three: Quick LearningThe scientists retaught ("reconditioned") the mice to fear the tone by pairing it with the mild shock again. Then they put the mice in the same chamber, but didn't shock them. The transgenic mice were at first more fearful of the chamber, likely because they remembered the shocks, but they also calmed down quicker than the control mice. Perhaps they understood the change in the conditions quicker. This could mean that they learned more effectively.
Test Four: Are these Mice Spatial? The final test
looked at the spatial skills of the mice. A mouse-size
pool was filled with cloudy water, with a ramp hidden somewhere in the
pool. The goal was to find the ramp: if the mouse found the ramp, it could
climb out of the water. It only took the transgenic mice about three
"swims" to find the ramp; the control mice required about six tries. A
swimming result! | ||||
Why So Many Tests?The various tests demonstrated several aspects of brain function. These experiments show that the mouse brain processes information related to touch, sights, and sounds using a common biochemical pathway that involves the NMDA receptor.These Mice are Smarter...Or Are They?News reports have hailed these engineered mice as "smart mice." Tsien himself has used this term. Although their performance on the tests is impressive, "smart" is not really the proper term for the mice. Tests were not done to assess their intelligence. In fact, it would be hard to get two people to agree on a precise definition of intelligence. It is more accurate to say that the mice learned faster and remembered longer, rather than to say they were smarter. People can have poor short-term memories and still be smart. There is no one gene that determines intelligence. Genes and experience influence what we learn and how we learn it.
Conclusions and Cautions This study suggests that the NMDA receptor is
crucial to learning and memory. This receptor is also present in human
brains, so perhaps this work will lead to treatment for Alzheimer's
disease, or other diseases in which learning and memory are impaired. But
don't expect this to happen any time soon. This is just the first step,
and a small step, toward improving our ability to learn and retain
memories. No one knows the long-term effect of altering the brain's
chemistry. The NMDA receptor, for example, lets calcium into brain cells.
Too much calcium may make you more apt to have a stroke. A change
seemingly as
small as manipulating one gene or one protein can have huge
consequences. |
|
References and further information:
|
| BACK TO: | Neuroscience In The News | Table of Contents |
![]() Send E-mail |
![]() Fill out survey |
![]() Get Newsletter |
![]() Search Pages |