Modifying an Approved Human Subjects Application

The process for modifying (or amending) an existing Human Subjects Application varies depending on the nature of the desired modification. Some modifications are routine, and can be reviewed and approved administratively. Others are substantive, and must be reviewed either by a subcommittee of the appropriate Human Subjects Review Committee, or by the full Committee.

In all cases, however, modifications must be reviewed and approved before they can be implemented.

An application may be modified with respect to one or more of the following:

A useful rule of thumb is that a change in any one of the above (and minor ancillary adjustments in the others) may be reviewed administratively; a change in any two may or may not require more than administrative review, and a change in three or more, or any change in substantive risk to subjects, will very likely require review by a full Committee, and perhaps even submission of a new application.

The reviewing Committee may, at its discretion, request a full new application whenever repeated modifications have made it hard for reviewers to discern the current activities and procedures involved in the study.

It is very helpful to use the Modification Form, since that form asks for all necessary information, thus eliminating time that might be spent getting that information before the modification can be reviewed. The form should be used as a cover sheet; a memorandum providing any necessary additional information should be attached to each of the three copies of the modification form. After July 1, 2001, no modification will be reviewed if it is not submitted on a current Modification Form.

Submitting a Modification

Procedure: Submit a modification form in triplicate (a signed original and two copies) and (if necessary) a memorandum (also in triplicate, collated with the modification form), collated with three (3) copies of all revised or additional materials - consent forms, instruments, advertisements, recruitment flyers, and so on. When adding a grant, contract, dissertation or other proposal, also submit one (1) copy of the complete funding proposal. The modification form should be signed by the principal investigator or someone authorized to sign for the principal investigator; any such authorization must be clearly documented in the file, or the modification proposal cannot be considered.

Explanation: The Human Subjects Division must keep two file copies of all material relevant to each Application (they are sent to the reviewers at the time of regular renewal review); the third copy is returned to the investigator for the investigator's records. Since the Human Subjects Division is asked to certify that what has been approved in a Human Subjects Application is what is being proposed in a grant, contract, dissertation or other proposal, it is necessary to be able to compare one with the other in order to be able to issue the certification.

The modification proposal must be signed by the principal investigator or other authorized person to document that it is in fact an authorized modification. Since the principal investigator is responsible for the activities of other investigators and staff, and for their compliance with relevant regulations, it is important that modifications to approved procedures be authorized by the PI.

Special Points


To:
main Finder page
Human Subjects Division Forms page
main Human Subjects Division page