Philosophy Department

Syllabus contents:

Course Description

Assignments and Grading Policy

Texts

Class Schedule and Required Readings

 

PHIL314 Autumn Quarter 2008
Philosophy of Crime and Punishment

Syllabus

Instructor: Gabriela Remow
Office: Condon 511A
E-mail: angelic1@u.washington.edu
Office Hours: W F 1:30-2:30 p.m. (CDH 511A)
Course Times and Location:  M W F 2:30-3:50pm (DEN 306)
Wed. Sep. 24 through Fri. Dec. 5 (no class Fri. Nov. 28)
Final Exam: Tue. Dec. 9, 2:30-4:20 p.m. (DEN 306)
Course Web site: http://staff.washington.edu/angelic1/314/

 

Course Description

Philosophy of Crime and Punishment

Examination of philosophical theories regarding criminal habits and punishment and the philosophical problems connected with specific topics in criminal law. Examines proper subject matter of criminal law (drug use, pornography, euthanasia); limits of criminal sanctions; crime and privilege (corporate crime, white-collar crime, blackmail); justifications for punishment; mercy; and execution.


<-- RETURN TO TOP

Assignments and Grading Policy

The course requirements are as follows.  All students are expected to have read the assigned material in advance of the class period in which it will be discussed.  Your grade will be based on the following assignments:

1) DAILY READING RESPONSE (150 points total, divided into three parts as described below): A minimum overall score of 80 points is required to pass this assignment.

*1a) DAILY READING RESPONSE (80 points):  Our class is scheduled to meet 31 times this quarter.  One of those days is the first day of class, one is scheduled for the midterm exam, and on another day you will have a different assignment.  For the remaining 28 days, you are required to hand in at the beginning of class a typed assignment (not to exceed one page in length) based on the reading for that day (see the reading schedule for specific details).  Late entries will not be accepted without a documented excuse.

Each response will be graded as either “good” (3 points), “satisfactory” (2 points), "disappointing" (1 point), or “unsatisfactory” (0 points).  You will receive a satisfactory grade on a daily reading response that you turn in on time if you:  (a) write a response no longer than a page in length; (b) present the material systematically (i.e., state the problem and the response to it) with reference to the readings; and (c) show a minimal degree of comprehension.  (You may submit up to 28 responses, in your effort to reach the maximum score of 80.)

*1b) LONGER READING RESPONSE AND PRESENTATION (40 points): During the first week of class, each of you will choose a future day for this project.  Once during the quarter, on the day you chose,  you will write a longer reading response of approximately 3 pages, covering the material for that day in some detail.  During that day's class, you will give a presentation of approximately fifteen minutes, discussing the main points and arguments of a reading for that day.  It is highly recommended that you confer with me in advance about your presentation.

*1c) IN-CLASS QUESTION (30 points): You are expected to be in class participating in discussions, unless you have a documented excused absence.  Sometime during each class session, except for the day of the midterm, you will be asked to write a brief response to some question about that day's discussion.

Revision of syllabus, 10/14/2008

Original info:

2) MID-TERM EXAM (100 Points):  This will be a closed-book exam. You will be required to answer several questions in short answer or short essay form, in a blank and intact green book that you provide.  You will be required to demonstrate a comprehensive grasp of the materials studied in the course (including assigned materials not discussed in class) to the date of the exam, which will be given in class on Friday, Oct. 17.  A minimum of 53 points is required to pass this assignment.

Due to a regrettable administrative error, grades for the midterm described above must be thrown out, and the syllabus revised as shown below.  (Please treat the previous midterm as a good practice & preparation session for the final exam.)

Revised info:

2) MID-TERM EXAM (100 Points):  This will be a take-home exam. You will be required to answer several questions in short answer or short essay form.  The test will be handed out in class on Fri., Oct. 31.  Your typed responses will be due in class on Mon., Nov. 10.  A minimum of 53 points is required to pass this assignment.

3) FINAL IN-CLASS EXAM (150 Points):  The final exam will be similar in format to the midterm, but longer.  It will take place on Tuesday, Dec. 9th, in DEN 306, from 2:30-4:20 p.m. and will cover material from the whole course.  This will be a closed-book exam, where you answer several questions in short answer or short essay form, in a blank and intact green book that you provide.  A minimum of 80 points is required to pass this assignment.

Final Grade:  The maximum possible score is 400 points.  Below you will find a conversion table.  The first column represents total points for the course.  The second column represents the grade for the midterm exam.  The third column represents the grade for either the final exam or the daily reading response total.  The fourth column represents the approximate letter grade equivalent.  And the fifth column is the UW grading-scale equivalent.  (Please note that while I will use this table as a basis for the final grades in the course I reserve the right to make adjustments to it in the service of fairness.)

392-400                   98-100           147-150                A+                                  4.0
372-391                   93-97             140-146                A                             3.9-3.7
356-371                   89-92             134-149                A-                            3.6-3.5
340-355                   85-88             128-133                B+                           3.4-3.2    
324-339                   81-84             122-127                B                             3.1-2.8
308-323                   77-80             116-121                B-                            2.7-2.5
292-307                   73-76             110-115                C+                           2.4-2.2
276-291                   69-72             104-109                C                             2.1-1.8
260-275                   65-68              98-103                 C-                            1.7-1.5
244-259                   61-64              92-97                  D+                          1.4-1.2
228-243                   57-60              86-91                   D                            1.1-0.8
212-227                   53-56              80-85                   D-                           0.7
0-211                         0-52                0-79                   F                             0.0

Nota Bene:  (1) In order to pass this course students are required to:  a) have enough total points (i.e., at least 212 points); and also b) pass (i.e., receive at least 53 percent) in two of the three components of the course (i.e., daily reading responses, the midterm exam, and the final exam).  If you have enough total points to pass but do not pass two of the three components you will fail the course.  Absolutely no exceptions will be made to this policy.

(2) In some cases, when I calculate the final grade, I will also consider such factors as improvement and class participation.

(3) Academic Misconduct.  Cheating in any form will result in automatic referral to the Dean’s office.  In addition to plagiarism, this includes copying any work from other students, or allowing them to copy from you.  You are assumed to understand the university rules concerning inappropriate academic conduct, including what constitutes plagiarism.  If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the instructor.

Disability Resources for Students.  If you would like to request academic accommodations due to a disability, please contact DRS (see http://www.washington.edu/students/drs/).

<-- RETURN TO TOP


Texts

STUDENT COURSE MATERIAL PURCHASING INFORMATION
COURSE: PHIL 314
INSTRUCTOR(S): GABRIELA REMOW
PRICE: $82.16

LOCATION: www.universityreaders.com (big WHITE "Buy Here" button located
in the top right GOLD "Students" section of the page)
Detailed instructions available at
www.universityreaders.com/students/instructions.php

Your custom course materials published by University Readers contain
required readings that have been carefully selected for this course. If
you hope to do well in this course, it is paramount that you purchase it
and always stay on top of your reading. To purchase your course
materials, please visit University Readers at www.universityreaders.com
(students click the big WHITE "Buy Here" button located in the top right
GOLD "Students" section of the page). You will create an account and be
prompted to choose your state and institution. Easy-to-follow
instructions will lead you through the rest of the purchasing process.
Payment can be made by all major credit cards or electronic check. Your
order is then processed and shipped out to you swiftly (orders are
typically processed within 24 hours and often same day). Shipping time
will depend on the selected shipping method. If available for your
course, you will also be given instructions on how to download a FREE
20% PDF download or a Full Digital Pack so you can get started on your
required readings right away. If you have any difficulties, please
e-mail orders@universityreaders.com or call 800.200.3908.

Kevin Hoffman | Production Manager
University Readers, Inc.
3970 Sorrento Valley Blvd., Ste 500 | San Diego, CA 92121
khoffman@universityreaders.com | ph. 800.200.3908 x13
Fax 858-552-1422
www.universityreaders.com
Delighting Students & Professors Nationwide Since 1992!

  <-- RETURN TO TOP


Class Schedule and Required Readings

The reading and lecture schedule is as follows, and of course it may be subject to change.  Dates, readings, topics, and response questions are tabulated below.  Response questions will be updated  as we proceed through the quarter.

Class Date  Required 
Reading
Topic Response 
Questions
In-Class Question FYI
1 9/24 pp. 1-28, 43-45 Introduction to the course Explain, according to Friedman, (a) the functions of criminal justice, (b) the types of crime, (c) some problems with plea bargaining, and (d) forms of bias.  Explain the goal of the textbook (p. 45). State one function of criminal justice. Article: Rebecca Griego murder on campus at UW

Article: Disability is a civil rights issue

Murderball movie

2 9/26 pp. 128-151 The paradox of blackmail Explain why blackmail is said to be paradoxical.  Explain Gorr's resolution of the paradox. What, according to Gorr, is the meaning of "c-optional"?  
3 9/29 pp. 51-64 Mill's view of liberty Explain the object of Mill's essay.  Who does his principle apply to, and what is its basis?  What does Mill say is his strongest argument against public interference with personal conduct?  Explain Mill's criticism of "social rights." What is "moral police"? The Ghost Map book
4 10/1 pp. 65-74 Debate over the enforcement of morals p. 127, questions 2 & 3  What does Devlin mean when he claims that no society can exist without shared ideas on morals? Ad populum fallacy

Loving v. Virginia

Fugitive Slave Law

5 10/3 pp. 74-82, plus
Lawrence v. Texas
Homosexual conduct and the law p. 127, question 4

Explain what substantive due process is, and also what role it plays in the Lawrence decision.

Of all the arguments we discussed for and against the constitutionality of anti-sodomy laws, which one is the best argument? Substantive due process

Unenumerated rights

Adult incest case

Model Penal Code

6 10/6 pp. 82-93, 116-127 Privacy, stalking p. 127, questions 5 & 7 Explain Hume's claim, "a right without a remedy would be an absurdity." Hume, “Of Passive Obedience

Gavin de Becker's Gift of Fear

Article from today's paper 

7 10/8 pp. 94-116 Privacy p. 127, question 6 According to Gavison, what is the most important reason for us to make an explicit legal commitment to privacy?

Mill & de Tocqueville quotes

FERPA info for UW students and teachers

Ann Rule book

Kymlicka's Good & Bad Group Rights:
Talbott page, and Wikipedia page

8 10/10 pp. 195-212 Euthanasia p. 218, questions 1 & 2 What is the legal justification in the U.S. for the right to refuse treatment? Info on Dax
9 10/13 pp. 212-217 Suicide p. 218, question 3 Explain the connection between smallpox inoculation and suicide, according to Hume. Hume etc. on sentimentalism

Twain on suicide

Voltaire on smallpox inoculation

10 10/15 pp. 169-194 Drug use and the law p. 194, questions 1 & 2 What is CLAURD? Soylent Green movie

The Wire TV show

Slower right to die for paralyzed

11 10/17 Midterm Exam  Bring blank intact green book      
12 10/20 pp. 219-234 Pornography and the law p. 252, questions 1 & 2 What is "garrison threshold," & how does it apply to Clark's discussion?  
13 10/22 pp. 235-252 Feminist objections and counter-objections p. 252, question 3 What is the "offense principle"? Adam Smith passage

Schlosser's Reefer Madness info

Wild Swans (p. 369, "instinct for collecting")

The Poisonous Mushroom

14 10/24 pp. 253-280 Gun control p. 294, question 1 (Explain Dixon) What is MAD? Mill on poison etc.

Amenable mortality

Culture Code book (re: French food)

U.S. traffic fatalities

Recent Supreme Court decision

15 10/27 pp. 280-294 Defensive gun ownership p. 294, question 2 Name at least one author we have read who uses deontological arguments, and at least one who uses consequentialist arguments. Kant & Mill excerpts

Crystal Brame case

'Jilted' woman 'kills' virtual husband

16 10/29 pp. 152-168 Criminal law and corporate behavior p. 168, questions 1-3 Give an example of an argument opposing our readings for today. White Collar Crime (Wikipedia page)
17 10/31 3 items:

Harvard Journal on Legislation, Winter, 2008, 45 Harv. J. on Legis. ARTICLE: SPAM STILL PAYS: THE FAILURE OF THE CAN-SPAM ACT OF 2003 AND PROPOSED LEGAL SOLUTIONS, John Soma*, Patrick Singer** and Jeffrey Hurd***

Find on Lexis-Nexis at UW Libraries site (UW login required)

Spam King
Article 1
Article 2

Spam Explain why criminal law should address email activities.  Explain some problems with the current law. Explain and evaluate some of the proposed legal solutions. Why did Soma, Singer, & Hurd recommend redefining spam as unsolicited commercial email?  
18 11/3 pp. 295-316 Criminal limits on free speech p. 330, question 1 Why can't there be such a thing as "anti-government obscenity"? Aurora Bridge Bus Suicide
19 11/5 pp. 316-330 Hate speech and harm p. 330, questions 2-3 According to Altman, what is the harm in hate speech that justifies regulating it? Aurora Bridge Suicide Survivors

UW Policies on Speech

20 11/7 pp. 333-352 Utilitarian justification of punishment p. 364, questions 1, 3 According to Bentham, why is punishment for "bad" writings needless?  
21 11/10 pp. 352-364 Consequences of punishment p. 364, questions 2, 4 Which aspects of punishment discussed in Ten's article did not produce good effects? Thai speech crime

Coker v. Georgia (see dissent)

After Innocence movie

Thin Blue Line movie

Cognitive dissonance book

Monster of Florence book

Public Defender crisis

22 11/12 pp. 365-383 Retributive justification of punishment p. 383, questions 1-4 What is telishment?  
23 11/14 pp. 384-403 Compromise theories p. 403, questions 1-4 What is DH? 100 Best (Rawls #28)

FBI Crime Statistics (2007)

24 11/17 pp. 404-423 Moral education theory p. 439, question 1 (Explain the reading) What is "legitimate elimination"? Columns article on UW murder class

Fire Lover book

25 11/19 pp. 423-439 Objections to moral education theory p. 439, questions 2, 3 What is paternalistic about moral education?  
26 11/21 pp. 502-518 Mercy p. 518, questions 1, 2 What is meant by "prima facie moral principles"?  
27 11/24 Hume Smith PDF Sentimentalist theories (Hume, Smith) Explain why, according to Hume, societies develop institutions for organized punishment.  What is the justification for doing so? Explain Smith's statement (in the footnote) about the Author of nature, regarding punishment.  Explain Smith's view about the propriety of gratitude or resentment toward inanimate objects, animals, people. Explain Smith's three qualifications. What does he mean about shadows of merit and demerit? According to sentimentalists such as Hume & Smith, what makes something right or wrong? Hume's Standard of Taste excerpt
28 11/26 Burke PDF

Also see 388-391

More sentimentalism (Burke) Explain Burke's view of sympathetic revenge. Explain his claim that the mass of the people ought never be treated as criminal, and the reasons for this claim. What does he mean by rebellion against the Law of nature? Explain his claim about the impossibility of government standing for a year.  Explain the bad consequences of "a great havoc among criminals." Why does Burke recommend punishing offenders  from principle?  Explain what he says about mercy and comparative justice. Explain why Burke thinks the grounds of libel laws just & equitable. What is the point of punishment in general, and of the pillory in particular? What does Burke think of the crime of sodomitical practices? Explain Burke's position regarding the subsequent libel. What is the purpose of the pillory as punishment? Gordon Riots

Articles about U.N. & crimes against humanity:
11/30/07;
9/25/07

29 12/1 pp. 519-535 Capital punishment Explain the legal reasoning in the cases. Which Supreme Court Justice thinks the death penalty unconstitutional by its very nature?  
30 12/3 pp. 535-548 In defense of capital punishment Explain the arguments. In addition to execution and confinement, what other criminal punishment is commonly used in this country?  
31 12/5 pp. 548-568 Objections to capital punishment Explain the arguments. Which crime that we have discussed this quarter harms the victim's reputation?  
  12/9
2:30-4:20 p.m.
DEN 306
Final Exam Bring blank intact green book      

 <-- RETURN TO TOP

 

 BACK TO TOP

 Last Updated:
09/04/08

Contact the instructor at: angelic1@u.washington.edu