|
Course Description
Philosophy of Crime and Punishment
Examination of philosophical theories
regarding criminal habits and punishment and the philosophical problems
connected with specific topics in criminal law. Examines proper subject
matter of criminal law (drug use, pornography, euthanasia); limits of
criminal sanctions; crime and privilege (corporate crime, white-collar
crime, blackmail); justifications for punishment; mercy; and execution.
<-- RETURN TO TOP
Assignments and Grading Policy
The course requirements are as follows.
All students are expected to have read the assigned material in
advance of the class period in which it will be discussed.
Your grade will be based on the following assignments:
1) DAILY READING RESPONSE (150 points
total, divided into three parts as described below): A minimum overall score of
80 points is
required to pass this assignment.
*1a) DAILY READING RESPONSE (80 points):
Our class is scheduled to meet 31 times this quarter. One of those
days is the first day of class, one is scheduled for the midterm exam, and on another day you will have
a different assignment. For the remaining 28 days, you are
required to hand in at
the beginning of class a typed assignment (not to exceed one page in
length) based on the reading for that day (see the reading schedule for
specific details). Late entries will not be
accepted without a documented excuse.
Each response will be graded as either “good”
(3 points),
“satisfactory” (2 points), "disappointing" (1 point), or “unsatisfactory” (0 points).
You will receive a satisfactory grade on a daily reading response that you
turn in on time if you:
(a) write a response no longer than a page in length; (b) present the material
systematically (i.e., state the problem and the response to it) with
reference to the readings; and (c) show a minimal degree of
comprehension. (You may submit
up to 28 responses, in your effort to reach the maximum score of 80.)
*1b) LONGER READING RESPONSE AND PRESENTATION (40 points): During
the first week of class, each of you will choose a future day for this
project. Once during the quarter, on the day you chose,
you will write a longer reading response of approximately 3 pages,
covering the material for that day in some
detail. During that day's class, you will give a presentation of
approximately fifteen minutes, discussing the main points and
arguments of a reading for that day. It is highly recommended that
you confer with me in advance about your presentation.
*1c) IN-CLASS QUESTION (30 points): You are expected to be
in class participating in discussions, unless you have a documented
excused absence. Sometime during each class session, except for the day of the midterm, you will be asked to write a brief response to
some question about that day's discussion.
Revision of
syllabus, 10/14/2008
Original info:
2) MID-TERM EXAM
(100 Points): This will be a closed-book exam. You will be
required to answer several questions in short answer or short essay
form, in a blank and intact green book that you provide. You will
be required to demonstrate a comprehensive grasp of the materials
studied in the course (including assigned materials not discussed in
class) to the date of the exam, which will be given in class on Friday,
Oct. 17. A minimum of 53 points is required to pass this
assignment.
Due to a regrettable
administrative error, grades for the midterm described above must be
thrown out, and the syllabus revised as shown below.
(Please treat the previous midterm as a good practice &
preparation session for the final exam.)
Revised info:
2) MID-TERM EXAM
(100 Points): This will be a take-home exam. You will be
required to answer several questions in short answer or short essay
form. The test will be handed out in class on Fri., Oct. 31.
Your typed responses will be due in class on Mon., Nov. 10.
A minimum of 53 points is required to pass this assignment.
3) FINAL IN-CLASS EXAM (150 Points):
The final exam will be similar in format to the midterm, but longer. It will take place on Tuesday, Dec. 9th, in DEN 306, from
2:30-4:20 p.m. and will cover material from the whole course. This will be a closed-book
exam, where you answer several questions in short answer or
short essay form, in a blank and intact green book that you provide. A
minimum of 80
points is required to pass this assignment.
Final Grade: The
maximum possible score is 400 points.
Below you will find a conversion table. The first column
represents total points for the course. The second column
represents the grade for the midterm exam. The third column
represents the grade for either the final exam or the daily reading
response total. The
fourth column represents the approximate letter grade equivalent. And the fifth column is the UW grading-scale
equivalent. (Please note that while I will use this table as a
basis for the final grades in the course I reserve the right to make
adjustments to it in the service of fairness.)
392-400
98-100
147-150
A+
4.0
372-391
93-97
140-146
A
3.9-3.7
356-371
89-92 134-149
A-
3.6-3.5
340-355
85-88 128-133
B+
3.4-3.2
324-339
81-84 122-127
B
3.1-2.8
308-323
77-80 116-121
B-
2.7-2.5
292-307
73-76 110-115
C+
2.4-2.2
276-291
69-72 104-109
C
2.1-1.8
260-275
65-68 98-103
C-
1.7-1.5
244-259
61-64 92-97
D+
1.4-1.2
228-243
57-60 86-91
D
1.1-0.8
212-227
53-56 80-85
D-
0.7
0-211
0-52
0-79
F 0.0
Nota Bene: (1) In
order to pass this course students are required to: a) have enough
total points (i.e., at least 212 points); and also b) pass (i.e.,
receive at least 53 percent) in two of the three components of the
course (i.e., daily reading responses, the midterm exam, and the final
exam). If you have enough total points to pass but do not pass two
of the three components you will fail the course. Absolutely no
exceptions will be made to this policy.
(2) In some cases, when I calculate the final
grade, I will also consider such factors as improvement and class
participation.
(3) Academic Misconduct. Cheating in any form will result in automatic referral to the Dean’s
office. In addition to
plagiarism, this includes copying any work from other students, or allowing them
to copy from you. You are assumed to understand the university rules
concerning inappropriate academic conduct, including what constitutes
plagiarism. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact the instructor.
Disability Resources for Students.
If you would like
to request academic accommodations due to a disability, please contact DRS (see http://www.washington.edu/students/drs/).
<-- RETURN TO TOP
Texts
STUDENT COURSE MATERIAL PURCHASING INFORMATION
COURSE: PHIL 314
INSTRUCTOR(S): GABRIELA REMOW
PRICE: $82.16
LOCATION: www.universityreaders.com
(big WHITE "Buy Here" button located
in the top right GOLD "Students" section of the page)
Detailed instructions available at
www.universityreaders.com/students/instructions.php
Your custom course materials published by University Readers contain
required readings that have been carefully selected for this course. If
you hope to do well in this course, it is paramount that you purchase it
and always stay on top of your reading. To purchase your course
materials, please visit University Readers at www.universityreaders.com
(students click the big WHITE "Buy Here" button located in the
top right
GOLD "Students" section of the page). You will create an
account and be
prompted to choose your state and institution. Easy-to-follow
instructions will lead you through the rest of the purchasing process.
Payment can be made by all major credit cards or electronic check. Your
order is then processed and shipped out to you swiftly (orders are
typically processed within 24 hours and often same day). Shipping time
will depend on the selected shipping method. If available for your
course, you will also be given instructions on how to download a FREE
20% PDF download or a Full Digital Pack so you can get started on your
required readings right away. If you have any difficulties, please
e-mail orders@universityreaders.com
or call 800.200.3908.
Kevin Hoffman | Production Manager
University Readers, Inc.
3970 Sorrento Valley Blvd., Ste 500 | San Diego, CA 92121
khoffman@universityreaders.com
| ph. 800.200.3908 x13
Fax 858-552-1422
www.universityreaders.com
Delighting Students & Professors Nationwide Since 1992!
<-- RETURN TO TOP
Class Schedule and Required Readings
The reading and lecture schedule is as
follows, and of course it may be subject to change. Dates,
readings, topics, and response questions are tabulated below.
Response questions will be updated as we proceed through the
quarter.
| Class |
Date |
Required
Reading |
Topic |
Response
Questions |
In-Class Question |
FYI |
| 1 |
9/24 |
pp. 1-28, 43-45 |
Introduction to the course |
Explain, according to Friedman, (a) the functions of criminal
justice, (b) the types of crime, (c) some problems with plea
bargaining, and (d) forms of bias. Explain the goal of the
textbook (p. 45). |
State one function of criminal justice. |
Article: Rebecca
Griego murder on campus at UW
Article: Disability
is a civil rights issue
Murderball
movie
|
| 2 |
9/26 |
pp. 128-151 |
The paradox of blackmail |
Explain why blackmail is said to be paradoxical. Explain
Gorr's resolution of the paradox. |
What, according to Gorr, is the meaning of
"c-optional"? |
|
| 3 |
9/29 |
pp. 51-64 |
Mill's view of liberty |
Explain the object of Mill's essay. Who does his
principle apply to, and what is its basis? What does Mill
say is his strongest argument against public interference with
personal conduct? Explain Mill's criticism of "social
rights." |
What is "moral police"? |
The Ghost Map book |
| 4 |
10/1 |
pp. 65-74 |
Debate over the enforcement of morals |
p. 127, questions 2 & 3 |
What does Devlin mean when he claims that no society can exist
without shared ideas on morals? |
Ad populum
fallacy
Loving
v. Virginia
Fugitive
Slave Law
|
| 5 |
10/3 |
pp. 74-82, plus
Lawrence
v. Texas |
Homosexual conduct and the law |
p. 127, question 4
Explain what substantive due process is, and also what role
it plays in the Lawrence decision.
|
Of all the arguments we discussed for and against the
constitutionality of anti-sodomy laws, which one is the best
argument? |
Substantive
due process
Unenumerated
rights
Adult
incest case
Model
Penal Code
|
| 6 |
10/6 |
pp. 82-93, 116-127 |
Privacy, stalking |
p. 127, questions 5 & 7 |
Explain Hume's claim, "a right without a remedy would be
an absurdity." |
Hume, “Of
Passive Obedience”
Gavin de Becker's Gift
of Fear
Article
from today's paper
|
| 7 |
10/8 |
pp. 94-116 |
Privacy |
p. 127, question 6 |
According to Gavison, what is the most important reason for us
to make an explicit legal commitment to privacy? |
Mill & de Tocqueville quotes
FERPA info for UW students
and teachers
Ann Rule book
Kymlicka's Good & Bad Group Rights:
Talbott
page, and Wikipedia
page
|
| 8 |
10/10 |
pp. 195-212 |
Euthanasia |
p. 218, questions 1 & 2 |
What is the legal justification in the U.S. for the right to
refuse treatment? |
Info on Dax |
| 9 |
10/13 |
pp. 212-217 |
Suicide |
p. 218, question 3 |
Explain the connection between smallpox inoculation and
suicide, according to Hume. |
Hume etc. on sentimentalism
Twain on suicide
Voltaire
on smallpox
inoculation
|
| 10 |
10/15 |
pp. 169-194 |
Drug use and the law |
p. 194, questions 1 & 2 |
What is CLAURD? |
Soylent Green
movie
The Wire
TV show
Slower
right to die for paralyzed
|
| 11 |
10/17 |
Midterm Exam
|
Bring blank intact green book
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
10/20 |
pp. 219-234 |
Pornography and the law |
p. 252, questions 1 & 2 |
What is "garrison threshold," & how does it
apply to Clark's discussion? |
|
| 13 |
10/22 |
pp. 235-252 |
Feminist objections and counter-objections |
p. 252, question 3 |
What is the "offense principle"? |
Adam Smith passage
Schlosser's
Reefer Madness info
Wild Swans
(p. 369, "instinct for collecting")
The
Poisonous Mushroom
|
| 14 |
10/24 |
pp. 253-280 |
Gun control |
p. 294, question 1 (Explain Dixon) |
What is MAD? |
Mill on poison etc.
Amenable
mortality
Culture
Code
book (re: French food)
U.S.
traffic fatalities
Recent
Supreme Court decision
|
| 15 |
10/27 |
pp. 280-294 |
Defensive gun ownership |
p. 294, question 2 |
Name at least one author we have read who uses deontological
arguments, and at least one who uses consequentialist arguments. |
Kant & Mill excerpts
Crystal
Brame case
'Jilted'
woman 'kills' virtual husband
|
| 16 |
10/29 |
pp. 152-168 |
Criminal law and corporate behavior |
p. 168, questions 1-3 |
Give an example of an argument opposing our readings for
today. |
White
Collar Crime (Wikipedia page) |
| 17 |
10/31 |
3 items:
Harvard Journal on Legislation, Winter, 2008, 45
Harv. J. on Legis. ARTICLE: SPAM STILL PAYS: THE FAILURE OF THE
CAN-SPAM ACT OF 2003 AND PROPOSED LEGAL SOLUTIONS, John
Soma*, Patrick Singer** and Jeffrey Hurd***
Find on Lexis-Nexis at UW Libraries site (UW login required)
Spam King
Article
1
Article
2
|
Spam |
Explain why criminal law should address email
activities. Explain some problems with the current law.
Explain and evaluate some of the proposed legal solutions. |
Why did Soma, Singer, & Hurd recommend redefining spam as
unsolicited commercial email? |
|
| 18 |
11/3 |
pp. 295-316 |
Criminal limits on free speech |
p. 330, question 1 |
Why can't there be such a thing as "anti-government
obscenity"? |
Aurora
Bridge Bus Suicide |
| 19 |
11/5 |
pp. 316-330 |
Hate speech and harm |
p. 330, questions 2-3 |
According to Altman, what is the harm in hate speech that
justifies regulating it? |
Aurora
Bridge Suicide Survivors
UW Policies on Speech
|
| 20 |
11/7 |
pp. 333-352 |
Utilitarian justification of punishment |
p. 364, questions 1, 3 |
According to Bentham, why is punishment for "bad"
writings needless? |
|
| 21 |
11/10 |
pp. 352-364 |
Consequences of punishment |
p. 364, questions 2, 4 |
Which aspects of punishment discussed in Ten's article did not
produce good effects? |
Thai
speech crime
Coker
v. Georgia (see dissent)
After
Innocence movie
Thin Blue Line
movie
Cognitive
dissonance book
Monster
of Florence book
Public
Defender crisis
|
| 22 |
11/12 |
pp. 365-383 |
Retributive justification of punishment |
p. 383, questions 1-4 |
What is telishment? |
|
| 23 |
11/14 |
pp. 384-403 |
Compromise theories |
p. 403, questions 1-4 |
What is DH? |
100
Best (Rawls #28)
FBI
Crime Statistics (2007)
|
| 24 |
11/17 |
pp. 404-423 |
Moral education theory |
p. 439, question 1 (Explain the reading) |
What is "legitimate elimination"? |
Columns
article on UW murder class
Fire
Lover book
|
| 25 |
11/19 |
pp. 423-439 |
Objections to moral education theory |
p. 439, questions 2, 3 |
What is paternalistic about moral education? |
|
| 26 |
11/21 |
pp. 502-518 |
Mercy |
p. 518, questions 1, 2 |
What is meant by "prima facie moral principles"? |
|
| 27 |
11/24 |
Hume Smith PDF |
Sentimentalist theories (Hume, Smith) |
Explain why, according to Hume, societies develop institutions
for organized punishment. What is the justification for
doing so? Explain Smith's statement (in the footnote) about the
Author of nature, regarding punishment. Explain Smith's
view about the propriety of gratitude or resentment toward
inanimate objects, animals, people. Explain Smith's three
qualifications. What does he mean about shadows of merit and
demerit? |
According to sentimentalists such as Hume & Smith, what
makes something right or wrong? |
Hume's Standard of Taste excerpt |
| 28 |
11/26 |
Burke PDF
Also
see 388-391
|
More sentimentalism (Burke) |
Explain Burke's view of sympathetic revenge. Explain his claim
that the mass of the people ought never be treated as criminal,
and the reasons for this claim. What does he mean by rebellion
against the Law of nature? Explain his claim about the
impossibility of government standing for a year. Explain
the bad consequences of "a great havoc among
criminals." Why does Burke recommend punishing offenders
from principle? Explain what he says about mercy and
comparative justice.
Explain why Burke thinks the grounds of libel laws just &
equitable. What is the point of punishment in general, and of
the pillory in particular? What does Burke think of the crime of
sodomitical practices? Explain Burke's position regarding the
subsequent libel. |
What is the purpose of the pillory as punishment? |
Gordon
Riots
Articles about U.N. & crimes against humanity:
11/30/07;
9/25/07
|
| 29 |
12/1 |
pp. 519-535 |
Capital punishment |
Explain the legal reasoning in the cases. |
Which Supreme Court Justice thinks the death penalty
unconstitutional by its very nature? |
|
| 30 |
12/3 |
pp. 535-548 |
In defense of capital punishment |
Explain the arguments. |
In addition to execution and confinement, what other criminal
punishment is commonly used in this country? |
|
| 31 |
12/5 |
pp. 548-568 |
Objections to capital punishment |
Explain the arguments. |
Which crime that we have discussed this quarter harms the
victim's reputation? |
|
| |
12/9
2:30-4:20 p.m.
DEN 306 |
Final Exam |
Bring blank intact green book |
|
|
|
<-- RETURN
TO TOP
|